October 2007

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Znane Wokale Acapella

Des Freud A ', the other's suffering - as the PEOPLE'S BANK GÖPPINGEN the only one doing good ...

order to improve education in terms VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN not to be stagnant, I would like to continue to let the pictures speak of various documents, because I assume that what is seen is more powerful than the written word.
If I am to be honest Sun reluctant to me the offender not to be named by name, but there is this unfortunate comparison of 16 January 2004, concluded the District Court of Ulm with Volksbank GÖPPINGEN it denied me and name although at a penalty of 250,000 EUR to the real culprit by name.
Although I can in principle be the same whether I am sentenced to pay this amount irrational, because I could not afford to 5,000 EUR, but I think that these "people" are not worth foist account of which is unnecessary difficulties. My family had already suffered enough because of which to a certain banker had the courage to his superiors the to submit facts in order instead of sacrificing my family knowing what he did to us.
that was not enough he also had the prosecutor Ulm as allies to his side, without asking big a prison sentence imposed against me even though they would have done better to the "other side" to purify a little burn behind closed doors to let. This one did not want to wake sleeping dogs lie and not to devote the entire banking system in question.
quick decision was made from a victim and an offender already approved the "balance" again.
But enough of preface. Again, I will show an example of how the PEOPLE'S BANK GÖPPINGEN was going to rout basically two partners against each other, was allowed to happen by processes that are more than questionable and were.
Set Just imagine that you have at the moment a debt of EUR 100,000 and that without security, so plain and want to buy a car which would cost 12 000 EUR. What do you think your banker would say if you present it to your wish would want to finance a car in such a parlous financial situation?
I say it to you. He would send in the desert or to the more secure if it is not just a means of transportation which takes you from A to B, but a vehicle comprises Middle class. Not so the
VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN. Here it is in certain individuals quite possible and if all "Bankerlein" refuse, so we'll do just a board member and told him that his subordinates are clearly not competent and decisive, what is the board member a tremendous boost and he must prove that he qualified in any case and can make decisions and may the subordinates can not just, and certainly not allowed.
And there was actually a verbal undertaking from the top bankers that gave it even though no loan agreement to purchase a car, led, however, that the car house of a friend's party immediately and was acquired due to a call that returns this top of Volksbank GÖPPINGEN with his party colleague.
As you can see from the car radio, this vehicle was on 30 Approved in June 2000. The car radio, you can also see that it is a vehicle of the upper middle class.

So I was able to follow and we see first the account balance in two accounts that you the first two account numbers should remember about the subsequent loan agreement or even understand better not to.

130 112 xxx The account can be seen that this account has over 15,000 DEM was in debt.

The account 135 707 xxx it is a sum in excess of 181 000 DEM, which is here to the loan account of the account 135 707 005, in which a coated checking account was first converted to a loan was. It is precisely this account, which suddenly disappeared at a later date from the scene and it is also the account from which I could not duplicate account statements to get without paying a considerable fortune to have my standards. Well, I have the statements and may explain why the non-transparent approach of the Volksbank Göppingen.

But now let us turn to the loan agreement with ominous premise, I can be equal to that for this car never even a single rate is paid for and the PEOPLE'S BANK GÖPPINGEN has now given away the car to the "buyer" by the Car radio, which was stored in the PEOPLE'S BANK GÖPPINGEN and served as security, has now been handed over to the owner.

Here is the first page of the loan agreement:

Please make on the number of the loan agreement, the top right and red. It's the same number as they can also be found on one of the accounts. The loan amount was 24,000.

Now the second page:

On the second page you can see that although the vehicle on 30 approved June 2000 that the first rate until 1 October 2000 should have been paid, which was a complete joke of course. The problem with the thing that the board member had a problem with the fact that he had indeed approved the purchase of automobiles but now had found no one who drew against this credit agreement by the bank or ever signed.

The whole thing went so well that after the vehicle was part of the dealership due to the call of the board member issued to the purchaser and approved, the car dealership but did not receive money that the loan agreement was not signed and sealed. There had to have been a telephone call in which a clear message that the Board member fell again between the two party colleagues caused the car buyer to call to ask him for it to ensure that the loan agreement at last comes to transfer the sum to the car dealers.

But the bankers turned dour and said only that the (Board member) had to tell him anything and ER (the Director) should have know that with such balances one car financing is possible. This said, moreover, the secretary of that board member.

now on 24 August 2000 was the agreement ready for signing. So almost 2 months after registration of the car. The whole thing was very entertaining and I can very well imagine that when this top banker calls again at his friend for a pre-party car sales to get some, that it answers most, with appropriate gestures very negative.

So all this is true of course but I'll worry about focusing on my next contribution to the defunct bank account with the account number 135 707 005th

The question is how come is it that you draw on a checking account with more than 180,000 DEM could. That was not enough, because after This account was adjusted by means of a loan, it allowed the VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN that this account was back with EUR 50,000 in the red. If you add up everything, so has the VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN the other account holder loose a quarter of a million € paid, together with a car. All for a transfer fee of EUR 15,000.

My next review is to say: Account 13707 005, at Volksbank Göppingen.

Sunday, October 7, 2007

Looking For Lorazepam In Urine

... But the claim schedules have been accompanied ... (Part 4)

The demand schedules were still accompanied by two letters and that it was a letter meant for me and the other writing for my wife:

And suddenly it was back in the account that by letter dated 6 December 2006 was deleted from the books. The account number was still the same and the question could be allowed that is now going on with that account now. Perhaps it was indeed an oversight on the part of the Volksbank Göppingen, not that I believed so completely in this possibility. My heart terrible.

But the information I could from Volksbank Göppingen get so I wrote on 30 September 2007, Volksbank Göppingen following letter: let

The answer is not long in coming, because By letter dated 1 October 2007 I received the following reply:

first I wanted to leave it at this state of things, and sent on 2 October 2007, Volksbank Göppingen following letter:

The longer I thought about it all the more unsatisfactory, however, seemed the result of my correspondence and therefore I decided on 4 October 2007 to do again, an effort as I sent another letter with the following wording from the People's Bank in Göppingen:

The Reply was pretty much as I had expected. There was no difference in it at that. A board member has signed with and so I got the answer, at least in fact by the Board:

With my letter of 6 October 2007, I completed the correspondence then, since it obviously makes no sense to continue to fritter away time makes no sense:

That was the current state of affairs. To understand the whole circumstances, however, one must start from scratch and, if possible, of course, from scratch, or from where it gets interesting.

And when all is clear, each must consider for himself whom he entrusted his best, namely his money in the future.

Should it still be someone of not quite knowing exactly what to do, the should feel free to contact me, because in person I can say much more than what I may write. Volksbank Göppingen is in fact very quick to those who complain loudly to be very costly shut up at the same time ban, continue to be allowed to name the culprits by name. And it must indeed be wrongdoers, because if someone with a clear conscience can identify with his actions, he may yet bear his name proudly on display. So obviously the people have bank-violence is a huge problem and even the lawyer of the People's Bank Göppingen had expressed to me was, in the same court order as a precaution also forbid his name mentioned. All this may well describe it as at least strange.

How To Drain Pus From Swollen Finger

confused bustle, or at least well-considered action on the part of VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN? (Part 3)

we now covers short time back for Christmas of 2006 (December 6) and consider the letter, which we on 7 Of December 2006:

I assume that each of the letter would have received the same thought had we, that was that this current account deleted and not replaced, after he had read the last sentence that the current account deleted in the books was set.
I had as a "connoisseur" of the Volksbank Göppingen assumed that under the previous deletions of other accounts and other amounts, then the process has continued and the ladies and gentlemen of the Volksbank Göppingen had finally realized that there's no point making claims to maintain the can never be served and by the enormous interest burden at some point must rise to infinity.
This could be served to anyone.
was also noted in the letter at any point where the value if it was not because you sure could be found, because you had to have at least the theoretical possibility of being able to use this account. In addition, it would be understandable in any case, the interest rate curve.
that as it went, I believe that this account was canceled and my wife henceforth no debt on this account, especially as they are for the account cover at all was responsible, but it is a consultation and transaction between me, a other person to whom the debt of almost a quarter of a million have also been published in full (the proof I kick) and is a (former?) attorney of the Volksbank Göppingen namely by a restructuring of the finances of the "third person" to bring about. My wife was really in an incredibly brazen and outrageous kind of "nailed to the cross." (The evidence I begin also in the form of a loan agreement which read while on the account of my wife, but I auswies a single borrower. No signature of my wife.)
The manager and an associated member of the board of Volksbank Göppingen, of a completely over-indebted person is also still a luxury car and financed the most likely had exceeded its powers totally did not know anything, and both the prosecutor's office in Ulm, as well as the district court in Ulm, introduced themselves fully behind this attorney and board member. The banks have just always right. And should not that be the case, the law in this case is being manipulated.
(After the course of the whole affair is to publish compelling the process and may well be completely indifferent to the reaction of the other side. Responsible Everyone has his actions themselves.)

Having never otherwise thought to allow this account really does not exist anymore, especially on the part of the Volksbank Göppingen never got a bank statement, I decided to anyway, obeying an inner inspiration, my existing debt, to obtain at the Volksbank Göppingen and turned so dated 24 September 2007 with the following letter to the Volksbank Göppingen also because the final list of claims dated back as 13 months.