John Tucker Must Die String

staff VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN have completely destroyed my family (Part 2) The Bank

share a great title as everyone has, and may possibly think of so many that I am the one immeasurably exaggerate and secondly it is very easy to allegations establish not already provable are.
I will by means of original documents, as announced, take the evidence that the headline is accurate and that it is even more true, as some imagine the most daring in his dreams can. The approach from the front of my family PEOPLES BANK GÖPPINGEN is cruel and inhumane and seeks out obvious base motives only focused on my family, as happened to ruin.
Having had booked the VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN the "new owner" of the account with the number 135707 005 after paying a small "mite" the whole debt, I had the faint hope you would do the same with me, especially as the PEOPLE'S BANK GÖPPINGEN the proceeds high my standards of life insurance and insurance in the training of my children had been held harmless.
But nothing happened like, and there is the guilt that I, what can be seen from the documents which I published, have caused at any time. The proof is anchored in the account number 135707 005 and the was the only reason that resisted the VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN vehemently opposed to duplicate my required of me, bank statements, or for the making of duplicates pre 1000 EUR demanded knowing that I did these 1000 EUR in general can not afford.
interesting in this context is the fact that this above account almost overnight was not. Also allowed the VOLKSBANK GÖPPINGEN safely assume that after I had requested the documents in no way owned by the same bin. My announcement of the publications we thought was a bluff, as I announced, although, from my side but nothing came.
The problem I in the whole Thing had was, how can I make all these statements into the network without the expense is too large and memory intensive should the whole thing to be. In addition, I have had the opportunity to post since I names of people who appear on these statements in order to safeguard the privacy rights, had to erase. I also wanted to make me the option of labeling the statements and that no originals have to describe.
I decided to "*. jpg" for the image format and then began to so so, hundreds of documents to photograph and then to be inscribed. It was tedious and very time consuming, however, the result can let's see what is evident from the six sample images. The originals remain untouched and now store 500 miles from me away, because you never know. Copies of the files are also outsourced, so I am calm and safe on the page.
were the way of me and all documents and facts of the judiciary, photographed in connection with various members of the NATIONAL BANK GÖPPINGEN and archived, and will then appear correctly in the chronology.
While it is nothing more useful to me, so are the visible events of high information value and I can only advise everyone, and he fared something like this to remain in the sinking, but heads held high to the Go public, because only when the public learns of the events, there is the vague hope that something changes and also including in relation to the bias of so many "legal scholar". One must in this context does not think selfishly of themselves, but one has the duty to prevent harm by his descendants.
See now that is the statement of loan account 135707 200 of 2 April 2000 (Voba2.jpg) of having a level of MINUS 177,980.15 DM, which corresponds to a value of minus 90,999.81 EUR.

in to enlarge the
Statements click note

Now you ask the bank statement of loan account 135707 200 a year later, on 2 April 2002 (Voba1.jpg) of having a level of MINUS 89,692.53 EUR.

Is not it strange that although it was served in this year's loan with about 8896 EUR, only about 1307 EUR were paid off? It's so weird how everything was going on. These numbers game only went to my account, because the only thing in common with this account I had was the name of it stood. All transactions were all past me to later at a disadvantage.
And now please look at the statement of the current account 135707 005 of 5 July 2001 (Voba5.jpg) having a level of 7855 EUR. The loan account number 135707 200 result of the checking account 135707 005, which was rescheduled on the loan. On 23 July 2001, the current account in re-coated with 7855 EUR.

On 5 October 2001 was the checking account number 135 707 005 (Voba3.jpg) is covered with 18,599 EUR,

on

by 5 exhibit December 2002 (Voba4.jpg) a stand-MINUS 41,329 EUR.
This was not a problem, because on 1 December 2002 it was re-supply in the form of a loan of EUR 43 415 EUR, as you can see from the excerpt. Though I to this account at no time available power was and I was therefore responsible for the movements of this account at any time, they took me, but I had always resisted fully in the duty and sitting today on a mountain of debt that I never made had. The proof of this I kick.

Now there was a second account, which had nothing to do with me and that the loan account number 130112 208 (Voba6.jpg). But under the so-called commitment to cleanup, this was also "adjusted".

But everything beautiful in turn. You will see that the one for 1000 EUR can be put to the sword, and drives into the hopelessness, while the other generous gifts of money or get to put it in the words of an attorney of the PEOPLE'S BANK GÖPPINGEN ". The People's Bank may finally give their money to whomever you want" How true.

ins foreword I would like to add also like to have two letters from me and two letters of Volksbank Göppingen which show clearly that the part of the Volksbank Göppingen across from me at all was no cooperation and had then already appeared as if it explained the The goal is to destroy me and my family.
that the key to everything said in this account was, it was clear from the start, but it should be made impossible for me ever in this Account to gain insight to the events there for me, obviously never würden.Am 20th August 2004 I sent to the Bank GÖPPINGEN following letter, which I brought, inter alia, the Board noted (AnVoba200804_1, AnVoba200804_2)

with me, of course, no letter from the Board reached, however, from the department of financial recovery, the following were the best (Unterlagen270804).

until 25 July 2006, I wrote again to the PEOPLE'S BANK GÖPPINGEN with the same concerns (AnVoba250706_1, AnVoba250706_2)

to a letter from the 31st July 2006 return to receive a rejection (Unterlagen310706)

Why it took so long until I after the initial call, the second call sent to the Bank GÖPPINGEN was due to the adverse conditions that lay between. But in the course of my remarks, I'll also be at these points in detail, covered with original documents received.
took Perhaps the reason why so long because I had a merciless optimist and as someone who always believes that to the good in people hope never buried, there still is a mutually agreed solution. And bulges as one involving one of the outstanding debt, I was almost convinced that I was now also leave them alone, especially since this would have been right and just. In addition, I was convinced that I recovered the life insurance and the training of my insurance Get children back. But I was wrong.

In the sequel, I will first make the two statements of claim PEOPLES BANK GÖPPINGEN opposite and it may form again everyone has their own opinion.

additional