error
white of the officials that his conduct is prohibited per se, so an error is about whether its action or inaction can have him for serving legal consequences (eg, because it erroneously assumes a crime committed off duty does not constitute a breach of discipline), irrelevant. For such an error concerning the relevance of the disciplinary action. This "legal consequence of error is irrelevant in disciplinary law.
sexual importunities
misconduct due to sexual harassment in the workplace lead to the Federal Administrative Court in a decision from the year 2009 is not specific to a regular measure. The plot width, in which sexual importunities of the service are conceivable is, in the opinion of the court too long as that uniform rules subject and their effects on respect and trust can be equally considered. Again, the particular circumstances of the case are relevant. In severe cases within the service, sexual harassment of female or male employees, especially if the officer fails just taking advantage of its superior property and thus not only his integrity in the department largely loses, but shattered his trust with the employer difficult, can, in principle, the question of its further portability in the public services, while may be imposed in less serious cases, a milder disciplinary action.
0 comments:
Post a Comment